🔗 Share this article American Men's Major Title Dry Spell Isn't Taylor Fritz's Burden to Carry I have a few thoughts regarding that comments made by the sports network commentator a well-known announcer following the Serbian champion's win over the American player in the US Open quarter-finals. Consider – Fritz is the United States, Fowler is from the US – and sports often lend themselves to patriotic sentiment. Some letdown was appropriate. Instead, Fowler brought up the ongoing absence of American men at the majors: none of them had lifted a title since Andy Roddick in 2003, and Fritz had been the final representative in the tournament. Everyone love a storyline, me too. But come on. Suppose the American had beaten Djokovic for the initial occasion, phenomenal talent Carlos Alcaraz was looming in the following match, whom he has never defeated in an official match. And had he somehow gotten past that, it would have been defending champion the Italian, against whom the American had dropped 10 of the previous eleven sets. The two young stars had also divided the last seven major titles (and the Spaniard went on to thrash a fatigued Serbian in the next round). Fritz stated in post-match interviews following his defeat that he actually preferred his draw, because it offered the opportunity to defeat the three best players in the sport back-to-back. Fritz is well within his right to aspire to the accomplishment; an athlete is supposed to believe in themselves. But entering that Djokovic last eight match who else in their right mind had the drought of American champions in mind? Coco Gauff’s weaker delivery the sole barrier between her and consistent victories Fritz, twenty-eight, is ranked number four in the world starting this week’s ATP World Tour Finals and has secured his previous six encounters over No 3 the German with growing comfort. It's likely he could take that spot for himself in the future. But evidently that right now, that is as high as he can climb: The Italian and Spaniard sit a vast gap of performance metrics away. Fritz’s elite serve and powerful power on each forehand and reverse side are more than adequate to dispose of most opponents on the ATP tour. When facing the select few generational talents, however, Fritz is frequently overmatched. The last several seasons has seen the interesting rise of tall, gangly athletes who can nonetheless cover the court with the alarming speed and grace of much shorter men. He is six-foot-five and appears that way. His movement is stiff, as if he hasn't fully adapted to his legs. So he seldom win a rally that the other player was controlling, and hitting a drop shot versus him is typically a reliable tactic. That serves as a pretty harsh restriction on his potential. The American has made a several significant, unexpected advancements over the years. At the beginning of the decade, he was hovering around the bottom of the top 30. Two years later, he was sniffing the elite ten. The previous season, he suddenly exploded up to No 4 – and held the spot. But the next leap, competing against and beating legendary figures like Alcaraz, Sinner, and including a aging Serbian, is the toughest of all. What was Fowler thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a serious threat to defeat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate commenting on the continuing slump of US male players lifting major titles when he had exited the New York major in the quarter-finals? The thirst is simply excessive and the respect for the difficulty of the challenge insufficient. The American star achieved a personal best advancement to the Wimbledon semi-finals in July. The American's performance in that very last eight match should have been enough of an sign. Djokovic won in four sets, a victory that only seemed uncertain for brief periods towards the very end, when Fritz had survived a couple championship opportunities and had a chance to hold for 5-5. The duo looked well-balanced during the rallies, with the American creating plenty of opportunities to break. But the champion saved service break opportunity after service break opportunity, extending the streak to the brink of agony. When Fritz finally did convert one of the chances at 5-5 in the middle stanza, he immediately played a horrendous game to lose his own serve once more; Djokovic had lulled him into a skirmish secondary to the real battle and compelled him to use far too much energy to prevail. Down set points in the last game, Fritz’s first serve sailed to heaven. He extended the contest two times on his backup delivery, but finally committed two errors. It was not a collapse, in my opinion, only a consequence of needing to hit an excessive number of second serves. The contest was fairly ironclad proof that the American is not good enough to defeat any version of the Serbian, who was defeated by the Spaniard in the following match and did not especially appeared like he thought he could triumph. This is absolutely acceptable – Djokovic is the greatest of all time, and may not be at the peak of his physical powers now, but has developed sufficient experience and strategic intelligence to make up for quite a bit of the drop-off. The issue is the individuals who were anticipating the American to win, and putting pressure on him to do so, when he was yet to done anything that indicated he would. The American is an valuable contributor to the tour nonetheless. He’s a calm, thoughtful presence in media sessions, more so than virtually everyone on the ATP aside from Daniil Medvedev, prepared to not just express his emotions or the tactic he believed determined a contest, but explain it. That he should shoulder the majority of the blame for America not spawn a male major champion since Andy Roddick feels unfair. (Now that the fellow American is rubbing shoulders with him in the rankings, perhaps they can share that load.) ATP Finals: Singles Groups American legend Group Carlos Alcaraz (Sp) Taylor Fritz (US) Alex de Minaur (Aus) Lorenzo Musetti (It) Swedish icon Group Jannik Sinner (It) The German powerhouse The rising American The Canadian talent “I would likely think about it indefinitely if I don’t do it,” the American told a journalist in June of winning a major. It is hoped he realizes that he’s not unsuccessful if he does not fulfill that objective, that overcoming Alcaraz and Sinner’s dominant, formidable empire is actually extremely improbable for everybody else. {