🔗 Share this article Donald Trump States Peace Proposal Isn't Ultimate Proposal as Delegates Assemble for Geneva Talks Former President Trump stated this past weekend that his Moscow-drafted peace plan was not his ultimate proposal, following fierce backlash from Ukrainian officials and analysts who compared it to a Munich pact of 1938 between Neville Chamberlain and Hitler. During short comments at the White House, the US president told reporters: Our goal is to achieve peace. It should’ve happened a long time ago … we’re trying to get it ended, one way or the other it must be resolved." Forthcoming Geneva Talks Involve Various Countries Ukrainian and American officials will meet in Switzerland on Sunday for discussions on this proposal. Defense representatives from France, Britain and Germany are expected to join the talks in Geneva. Prior to the talks, US senators informed the press that State Department head Rubio contacted them while en route to Geneva to clarify the nature of this disclosed proposal. He said, this plan did not originate from the administration but rather a "wish list of the Russians", according to independent Maine senator King, a member on the Foreign Relations Committee. Zelenskyy Faces Critical Time Limit However, Trump has set Volodymyr Zelenskyy a deadline of Thursday to sign the 28-point document. It calls on Ukraine to give up land it currently controls to Moscow, downsize the size of its army, and surrender long-range weapons. Additionally, it rules out a European peacekeeping force and sanctions for Russian war crimes. During a solemn address last Friday, the Ukrainian leader cautioned that his country confronts a difficult decision in the near future involving preserving its national dignity and forfeiting key ally in the shape of the US. Zelenskyy acknowledged that it faces one of the most difficult moments historically. Ukraine's Dialogue Delegation Appointed for Geneva Talks Speaking on Saturday, Zelenskyy said that real or respectable peace depends on "guaranteed security and justice". He revealed a negotiating team, appointed by presidential decree, that would soon meet its US counterparts in Switzerland, led by top aide Yermak. A additional delegate from Ukraine's team, former defence minister and national security council secretary Umerov, stated there would be consultations with the US "on the possible parameters of a future peace agreement". Hinting at red lines, he added: "Ukraine approaches this process with a clear understanding of its interests. This is another stage of the dialogue that has been ongoing in recent days and is primarily aimed at aligning our vision for the next steps." Global Response and Criticism Zelenskyy has attempted to participate positively with the US administration apparently intent to end the conflict based on Russian conditions. He has emphasized that he will not surrender the nation's independence or disregard a constitution that enshrines Ukraine's territorial integrity. During a summit held in South Africa, G20 leaders and the European Council released a collective declaration pushing back on Trump’s plan, saying it requires further refinement. It said that EU and Nato members must be involved on some of its provisions, that exclude Kyiv’s Nato membership and put conditions on its future EU accession. Citizen Opinion in Kyiv Responses from Ukrainians to the proposal, prepared by a Russian representative and Trump’s representative, have been largely negative. Analysts argued it outlined a plan for another Russian invasion: targeting not just Ukraine but other European regions too. Mustafa Nayyem, a journalist and politician involved in the 2014 Maidan protests, remarked it drew comparisons with Chamberlain’s infamous Munich deal. The proposal belonged to the same "recognisable genre", with the victim invited "to formulate his own defeat so everyone else can live easier". In a Facebook post, Nayyem said his anger by the complete pardon for Russian atrocities. This offended people who had hidden in basements in affected cities – sites of civilian executions – and families of deported children to Russia. "A rather cynical agreement," he stated. Speaking in a Kyiv subway station, Dmytro Sariskyi, a young adult, said that Moscow has attempted to control Ukraine politically and territorially "for years". It conceded "barely anything" in the Trump agreement and maintained its forces on Ukrainian soil. In my view, this deal aims to undermine Ukraine and impose unfair terms, he said. If Zelenskyy signed off on the proposals it would be compelled to give up its freedoms, he said. If it didn’t, the US might cease collaboration and intelligence exchange, a vital resource of battlefield information for frontline Ukrainian troops. "There is no good way out of this for now," he noted. Diverse Viewpoints from the Public A different commuter, 19-year-old Barchan, said that the country would remain resilient without American support. "We will fight for as long as it takes. Our territory will remain our territory, including Crimea and the east. They are Ukrainian land." She said Zelenskyy was a "smart person" and forecasted he would not give up Ukrainian land. Speaking during rainfall, next to a replica of Kyiv’s original medieval gate, Olena Ivanovna mentioned her appreciation to Trump for his peace-making efforts. She said that the nation should be ready to give away certain regions temporarily if it meant maintaining US support. The president should conduct a public vote on this matter, she said. European Leaders Criticize the Plan Former European heads of state have roundly condemned this proposal. Finland’s former prime minister Marin described it as a disaster, not only for Ukraine and Ukrainians but for democracies worldwide. She said if Western nations display vulnerability – similar to the 2014 Crimea annexation – further hostilities could arise. The former prime minister of Belgium, Verhofstadt, quoted Churchill’s definition regarding appeasement as someone who accommodates an aggressor. He added: Trump aligns with Putin. Europe must choose again: appeasement or our values, imperialism or freedom. Another moment of truth for our [European] union."